|
|
Home
> With teachers
in mind > Detecting plagiarism
Ana
sayfa > Öðretmenler için > Kopyalamayý belirlemek
Detecting
plagiarism : a self-help guide
when
to suspect, how to detect, how to stop it happening in the first place!
John
Royce, Library Director, Robert College of Istanbul
· Alarm bells : clues and giveaways
· Tricky kids
: how students sometimes try to hide their plagiarism
· When
you suspect plagiarism : techniques and
strategies in plagiarism detection
· Which search engine? :
some suggestions, and why you should use more than one
· When evidence
is difficult to find : when you're sure but just can't prove it
· Prevention better
than cure : preventing plagiarism happening in the first place
See also
the presentation/s Plagiarism: beating the cheats at <http://vm.robcol.k12.tr/~jroyce/workshops.htm>.
A constantly updated bibliography is available at <http://vm.robcol.k12.tr/~jroyce/plagbibl2.html>.
It is
commonly thought that the most reliable sign of plagiarism is when a
student suddenly produces work of far better standard than previously
submitted. This may well be true. However, while sudden rise in
quality might well indicate plagiarism, lack of quality does not
guarantee that the work is the student’s own. Many of the essays
available from internet cheat sites are of mediocre quality, much of the
material on the internet is of dubious and mediocre worth.
Some
obvious signs of plagiarism can be found on Plagiarizeddotcom’s page of
Dead Giveaways at http://www.plagiarized.com/deadgive.shtml.
You
might also be suspicious when:
|
Several
different styles of citation are used.
|
This could indicate lifting from several
documents, each using a different style of citation.
|
|
References to
pages are suspicious - especially if you know the work cited.
|
Note too that few school level text or
information books run to 700 pages...
|
|
The level of
works cited is way beyond the capability of the student.
|
If you do not know the authors, check the
references, find the books, check the web sites...
Some printed works may be so advanced your school library may not
have a copy.
You can sometimes check how advanced a book is by going to an
online bookstore!
|
|
Citations
refer to items not included in the bibliography.
|
This might indicate lifted work, the
passage/s simply copied and pasted without thought.
|
|
There are
references to tables or illustrations not included in the paper.
|
This too might indicate lifted work, the
passage/s simply copied and pasted without thought.
Many full-text databases include text, including references, but
do not carry the graphics mentioned in the text!
|
|
There is a
failure to cite good evidence.
|
This could mean that the evidence is
invented; evidence such as quotations, statistics and similar must
show sources.
|
|
There is a mix
of spelling, eg UK and US spelling, or foreign names are spelt in
two or more ways.
|
Again this might indicate lifting from
several documents, especially when the differences are not
accidental (for example: occasional writing of Philip and Phillip might be
accidental; cavalier interuse of Don Juan and Don John or of
Philip and Phillippe are likely to show two or more sources have
been used without proof reading).
|
|
There are
non-sequitors, bad leads from one paragraph to another, the joins
don’t sound right.
|
Could indicate several different documents
have been used.
|
|
The level of
language or the tone changes from paragraph to paragraph.
|
Could indicate several different documents
used.
Could indicate a mix of lifted passages and student's own work.
|
|
There are no
citations or no bibliography at all.
|
Even without suspicion of plagiarism, this
could be enough to downgrade the work. Where is the
evidence?
But be sure: were your instructions clear, were students aware
of the need to produce a bibliography? Have they been instructed
in when and how to cite?
When there aren't any citations or references, downgrade the work.
When there are references and citations, follow them up.
|
All
the above are indications, not proof, of plagiarism.
You still have to
prove your case
by finding the
original source/s the student has used.
Students
use a variety of tricks to hide their plagiarism. Tracking and tracing
requires a lot of work, and it pays to be aware of some of the tricks
used.
Cheating students often
|
Copy a large
section but reference or quote just a small portion of the lifted
passage.
|
Check the citation; look before and after the
section in quotation marks.
|
|
Build a
pastiche from several different sources.
|
Thus the need to check for keywords in close
proximity.
|
|
Make up
quotations and citations.
|
Check the citation. If it's a real source,
check that this is what is said. If you can't find the source, ask
for photocopy or printout.
|
|
Misquote or
misinterpret what was actually said in the original, the better to
suit their own arguments.
|
It could be a judgement call: deliberate
cheating or real misunderstanding? Your knowledge of the student
and/ or number of times it occurs could be factors.
|
|
Make up false
citations and references
· Using
an author/ periodical which is available in the library, rather
than the one cited in the original;
· Inventing
an author or source;
· Using
a real web site (but not the one from which the information is
lifted);
· Referencing
the home page of a web site but not the actual web page used.
|
The fact that an author exists, that s/he
really did write a magazine article or a book with the title as
shown, the fact that it is available in the library, perhaps even
a book that the instructor has read, all these serve simply to
mislead. When you are suspicious, you must check those
citations and references.
Similarly be wary of web site URLs and check them. If you cannot
find the page, demand a printout. (Ideally students will be warned
in advance that printouts may be demanded.) But the internet is
unstable, pages do disappear; the fact that you cannot find a page
is not necessarily proof of cheating, and it is also possible for
page contents to change between student discovery and your
checking. It is suspicious but not necessarily proof. Printouts
can help you decide.
|
Try
these techniques and strategies, in the order shown and as appropriate:
|
Number
One Rule:
Check any citations given, follow
up any works listed in the bibliography.
|
- Ask to see copies (or
photocopies) of books and journals used, printouts from web
sites etc.
- Does the library have
the books/ journals cited?
- Check citations, are
they genuine? Are they accurate?
Cheats sometimes make up quotations and
paraphrasing (though sometimes it is a case of misunderstanding what
they are paraphrasing);
sometimes they use a genuine quotation but change the attributed
source, perhaps to reflect what is actually available in the local
library;
sometimes they make up the URLs and web sites they claim to have
used;
sometimes they quote and cite correctly a sentence or two, but in
fact they have lifted a page or two or more.
All this should
become clear if you go to the sources used (or claimed).
|
|
Think about what
you already know.
|
If it sounds familiar, it could be you
already know the source: an author’s style, an article read
recently, esoteric references: anything that rings bells is worth
checking on.
|
|
Think about any
fact, statistic, statement used which should have an attribution,
but does not.
|
Where did they get this information? How do
they know? What PROOF is there?
These are amongst the
basic reasons for academic citation. Be suspicious when
facts are given without citation - and go looking for the source of
these facts!
|
|
Make an internet
search for the title.
|
Use several search engines and a meta search
engine or two.
Don’t forget to put the title in "inverted commas" to
make a phrase search.
|
|
Make an internet
search for unique keywords.
|
- Use several search
engines and a meta search engine or two
- If two or more words,
put them in inverted commas
- Use several
combinations of unique keywords, first scattered through the
document, then keywords in close proximity.
This scores when a large part of the paper has
been copied from a single source.
|
|
Make an internet
search for phrase or keywords in close proximity.
|
- Use several search
engines and a meta search engine or two.
- Use combinations of
phrases and keywords in close proximity; repeat from different
places through the document.
- Put any search phrase
inside "inverted commas".
- If a particular word
looks or feels awkward, just try using a more natural synonym.
The paper might be part original, part lifted;
it may be totally lifted but from a variety of sources. Checking
words in close proximity increases the chances of finding the words
together in the same document. Check from several places
through the essay to increase the chances of finding any (and
possibly every) different document used.
|
|
Search the
invisible web.
|
Search engines index only a small proportion of
the internet; some restrict themselves to the World Wide Web.
Much of the information in the invisible web is valuable, pertinent,
easily accessed and free. Get to know how to search the invisible
web!
|
|
Check your
school / public library.
|
It is just as easy to copy and paste from a cd-rom
as it is to copy from the internet - and of course, if it's not
on the internet, no amount of searching will find it there!
Online databases
are rich sources of information which, because they are usually on
subscription basis, are NOT searched/ indexed by search engines. You
must go where the kids go, must use the resources the
kids use!
Don't forget the
books and other print (and non-print) resources available to
students in the library.
|
|
Use your
networks.
|
Ask colleagues at your school.
Ask colleagues in other schools.
Use listservs, newsgroups and so on.
|
|
Check the
anti-plagiarism sites, use a free or fee-paying plagiarism detection
service.
|
Amongst the many services are Findsame;
TurnItIn; HowOriginal.com;
EVE2; Internet
Essay Explorer; Glatt
Plagiarism Services; EduTie.com;
Digital Essays; IntegriGard;
Plagiarism.org. Some are
free, some cost, some have trial offers. None
of these is perfect and all results require further checking.
Be
wary: a clean bill of health does not necessarily mean the
piece is genuine and plagiarism free. On the other hand, a possible
match may not necessarily prove that the piece has been plagiarised;
none of these services is perfect and
ALL results require further checking.Use the results as
indicators only. You still need to follow them up.
The great value of TurnItIn is its
growing database of work submitted on suspicion. The hope is that
essays NOT found on the internet will be submitted, and those
copying from each other rather than using online services will in
time be caught.
|
|
Check the cheat
sites.
|
It could be worth looking for essay titles and
/ or subjects on the cheat sites and paper mills; those which do not
publish their essays online usually include an abstract, and
indicate number of words or pages, number of citations, number of
items in the bibliography. The number of pages is no guide at all
(student may use a different font and thus have more or fewer
pages); the number of citations and items used can be an indicator.
|
|
Check Google
Answers.
|
Google Researchers normally try to avoid
answering directly any question which looks as if it is a school
assignment, preferring to explain what is needed, and to direct the
inquirer to some resources which could be helpful. Many assignment
questions may well get through. It could be worth going to Google
Answers and using the search tool on the home page.
Google Answers is part of the invisible web!
Google itself does not search and index Google Answers!!
|
|
Check Amazon.com
|
It could be an outside chance - but if you are
desperate it's worth trying.
Since late 2003, it has been possible to search the content of many
of the books stocked by Amazon.com.
Simply enter some suspicious keywords, and check out what comes up.
|
|
Number
Two Rule:
At
any time during the above, ask your librarian.
|
The school librarian may have an inside edge,
eg knowledge of resources in library which could have been used,
knowledge of places to search online and offline, may have more
advanced techniques and strategies and tricks up her or his sleeve.
S/he will also have a wider knowledge of invisible web resources, as
well as awareness of what is available in hard copy rather than
online!
|
Current
favorites include Google, and AllTheWeb,
favorite metasearch engines include Ixquick
and Vivisimo. Also use Yahoo!:
it may not be the best search facility, but it is favored by many students
and could lead you straight to their source. Researchville.com
provides quick access to a number of sources and search tools.
Use
several search engines; they search different areas of the internet and/
or the web, and they yield different results in different ways. There may
be little overlap between the hits of one search engines and the hits of
another, so the more search engines you use the better your chances of
detecting (internet) plagiarism.
Open
links in new windows.
Use
<Ctrl+F> to find keywords on a page, in a document.
Develop
a sense of which hits or leads to follow, which to ignore.
|
You don’t need to prove the whole thing has been lifted, once you
have made a few finds or found that a significant part of the essay
has been lifted, you may be able to stop searching if it is proving
time-consuming. Of course, the more you can prove has been
lifted, the more serious the offence.
You might just
keep a copy for future reference, or to try as your search skills
develop. You might even find the same essay submitted next
year...
You're not going
to catch them all: without giving ideas to students who don't
already have those ideas, there are just too many sources of
information available to make plagiarism detection easy and
foolproof. Vigilance and awareness is necessary - and better still,
an ambience where students find cheating counter-productive,
demeaning and self-defeating.
Above all, don't forget: if you can't find proof of plagiarism,
it could mean that the student really is innocent!
|
- Develop a school ethos of honesty, pride,
self-discipline.
- Develop a school policy on plagiarism, and
has procedures in place for dealing with it should it occur. Enforce
it!
- Students cannot be expected to know what to
do if they have never been shown. Correct use of quotation and
paraphrase, citation and bibliography need to be explained, practised,
discussed and demanded. And repeated and reinforced and role modelled.
- Especially while students are learning how to
do it properly, restrict the sources they can use, the better to spot
mis-use and poor quotation, paraphrasing etc.
- Demand hard-copies of sources used,
photocopies or print outs. Use them to check how they have been used.
- Make systematic but random intensive checks,
perhaps three or four essays every time you set one. Warn that any
student caught plagiarising will have earlier work checked and
re-graded retrospectively.
- Make the work interesting to students, make
it personal for them, use Essential Questions; many students copy
because they are bored with the work, have no interest in it, just
want it out of the way.
- Ask questions, get the students to ask
questions, to which there are no answers - and then tell them to find
answers, with evidence to support their viewpoints.
|
Remember:
research is not
about finding out,
research is about
finding evidence!
|
- Make work fresh, don‘t rehash last year's work. Make the topics
specific rather than generic.
- Get the kids into the Citation Habit – cite
right from the start.
- Use live feedback in class; get the students
to make a presentation, explain what they have found and how they
found it.
- Emphasise the process skills, work with the
kids as they make go seeking information, as they make their drafts,
as they revise and produce their final piece of work.
To
the top of the page
Sayfa baþý
|